Psychological Evaluations in Workers’ Compensation Claims
September 1, 2025Navigating Complex Causation Cases:
Multi-Factorial Injuries & Preexisting Conditions
When a workers’ compensation claim involves both a new injury and an existing health condition, the question of “what caused what” becomes anything but straightforward. Did the workplace event trigger something new? Did it accelerate an old issue? Or is it a mix of both?
At Comprehensive Diagnostic Center (CDC), we’ve spent nearly four decades helping attorneys, adjusters, nurse case managers, insurers, and employers find experts who deliver unbiased clarity in these challenging situations. Our structured, evidence-based approach untangles the threads of complex causation so claims can be resolved with fairness and confidence.
Why These Cases Get Complicated
Work injuries don’t happen in a vacuum. Many individuals already live with spinal degeneration, arthritis, past injuries, or other chronic conditions. When a workplace incident occurs, the line between natural progression and workplace aggravation blurs quickly.
That’s why these claims demand more than medical intuition; they require scientific reasoning, objective evaluation, and meticulous documentation.
Strategies for Assessing Multi-Factorial Causation
1. Establish a Clear Medical Baseline
You can’t measure impact without first understanding someone’s starting point. Having a complete medical history—including preexisting diagnoses, imaging, and treatments—gives you the “before picture” that’s needed to tell the difference between old conditions and new aggravations. Without this foundation, figuring out what caused what is just guesswork.
You can’t measure impact without first understanding someone’s starting point. Having a complete medical history, including preexisting diagnoses, imaging, and treatments, gives you the “before picture” that’s needed to tell the difference between old conditions and new aggravations. Without this foundation, figuring out what caused what is just guesswork.
2. Apply Proven Causal Frameworks
Science offers tools to bring structure to complex questions:
- Bradford Hill “viewpoints” (temporality, plausibility, strength of association) help assess causation systematically (Shimonovich et al., 2020).
- Forensic epidemiology uses comparative risk ratios to weigh causal contributions in clinical or legal settings (Wikipedia, 2025).
- Injury Causation Analysis (ICA) measures whether a workplace event exerted enough biomechanical force to cause injury—essential in musculoskeletal claims (Santos et al., 2024).
- The INFERENCE model integrates epidemiology with structured evaluation to create a transparent, probabilistic framework—particularly valuable in complex court cases (Meilia et al., 2020).
These frameworks shift causation analysis from subjective interpretation to defensible, science-backed conclusions.

3. Include Expert and Peer Input
An evaluation carries more weight when it isn’t just one perspective. Independent, board-certified specialists help ensure conclusions are balanced, neutral, and grounded in accepted standards.
4. Document Promptly and Thoroughly
When insurers argue that symptoms stem from the natural course of disease, contemporaneous documentation becomes critical. Detailed notes showing escalation or new treatment immediately after an incident can be the deciding factor.
5. Leverage Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Complex injuries benefit from multiple lenses. Physicians, biomechanical experts, therapists, and case managers working together produce deeper insights and better outcomes.
From Complexity to Clarity: Practical Takeaways
For legal and insurance professionals, the challenge isn’t just understanding the medical complexity; it’s knowing how to evaluate evidence in a way that holds up under scrutiny. That’s where structured approaches provide value.
- Medical baselines establish the “before and after.”
- Frameworks transform ambiguity into measurable analysis.
- Independent expertise strengthens credibility.
- Documentation creates the paper trail needed for fair resolution.
- Collaboration ensures no factor is overlooked.
When these elements come together, causation assessments move beyond speculation. They become transparent, defensible, and most importantly—fair to all parties involved.
Conclusion
Complex claims require clarity, not guesswork. At Comprehensive Diagnostic Center we’re committed to delivering structured, objective medical evaluations that bring confidence to your decision-making process.
Do you need help with a challenging claim?
Schedule an evaluation or call us today to speak with our team.
References
- Shimonovich M, et al. Assessing causality in epidemiology: revisiting Bradford Hill and modern approaches. PMC, 2020.
- Forensic epidemiology (overview). Wikipedia, 2025
- Santos EM, et al. Injury Causation Analysis Methodology for the Assessment of Workers’ Compensation and Motor Vehicle Collision Injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg., 2024.
- Meilia PDI, et al. INFERENCE: A Systematic Approach to Evidence-Based Medicolegal Causal Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020.
